ArticleJSES international2026
Is surgery always warranted for high-grade acromioclavicular dislocations?
Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The optimal management of high-grade acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations remains controversial. While surgical treatment improves radiographic alignment, its impact on functional outcomes remains debated. This study prospectively evaluated clinical and radiographic outcomes following clinically guided treatment allocation in patients with Rockwood type III-V injuries. Methods: In this prospective observational cohort study, 49 consecutive patients with Rockwood type III-V AC dislocations were managed according to predefined clinical criteria and shared decision-making. Surgical treatment was proposed in cases of non-reducible AC joint, persistent scapulothoracic dyskinesis, absence of early subjective symptomatic improvement, or cosmetic concerns. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Shoulder Subjective Value (SSV), Constant Score, and Acromioclavicular Joint Instability score. Standardized bilateral radiographs were analyzed at final follow-up. Regression analyses explored associations between radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes. Results: Twenty-nine patients were initially managed conservatively and 20 surgically; 3 patients (10%) required delayed surgical reconstruction after failed conservative treatment. Baseline SSV did not differ significantly between groups (40 ± 16 vs. 35 ± 10; Conclusion: In this prospectively followed, clinically allocated cohort, surgical treatment improved radiographic alignment but did not demonstrate superior functional outcomes compared with conservative management. When guided by predefined clinical criteria, conservative treatment was associated with satisfactory results and a low crossover rate. These findings support individualized, clinically driven decision-making in high-grade AC dislocations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.