ArticleJSES international2026
Population-specific statistical shape modeling of the Japanese shoulder: a combined analysis of the scapula and humerus stratified by sex and stature.
Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The smaller shoulder morphology typical of East Asian, especially Japanese, populations results in challenges when using implants designed from North American and European anatomies. Previous Japanese morphologic studies have focused on average shapes without adequately capturing population variability. We aimed to develop a combined statistical shape model (SSM) of the scapula and humerus reflecting covariation, and to quantify subgroup differences by sex and stature with corresponding point clouds. Methods: Pre-operative computed tomography scans from 114 Japanese arthroplasty patients without significant deformity were segmented, mirrored to right-sided geometry where applicable, and remeshed. Correspondence points were optimized separately and connected to create a combined SSM. Principal component (PC) analysis was performed, with both visualization of covariation at ± 3 standard deviations of each mode and calculation of morphological parameters at the same intervals. We evaluated the model performance for compactness (explained variation), generalization (leave-one-out cross-validation), and specificity using 10,000 random shapes. Morphological parameters were measured with SSM-derived correspondence points and compared across 6 sex- and stature-based subgroups (eg, female-140 to male-170). Results: In the combined SSM, PC1 represented global scaling, PC2 reflected coracoid variation, and PC3 represented scapular aspect ratio and lateral scapular structures. Compactness indicated that 95% of the variance was explained by 13 PCs. Regarding generalization, leave-one-out cross-validation error decreased as PCs and sample size increased, converging 26 PCs and 22 cases. Specificity testing showed that even as the number of PCs increased, the 10,000 generated shapes consistently showed low average point distance to the nearest training samples. The mean ± standard deviation values of parameters were similar between the subject and randomly generated groups. Cross-bone prediction with the combined SSM yielded lower errors than baseline mean-shape estimates. Subgroup analyses demonstrated significant differences of the morphologic parameters by sex and stature, including scapula height (132 ± 8 mm in female-140 to 165 ± 7 mm in male-170, Conclusion: A combined Japanese shoulder SSM was developed that captured the morphological variance with high model performance. Corresponding points enabled precise characterization of subgroup-specific morphologies stratified by sex and stature. This stratified model may be utilized for patient-specific treatment, including implant design and positioning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.