ArticleGeriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation2026
Back to the Future? Institutional Learning Curves and Intraoperative Fracture Rates Associated With Adoption of a Cemented Composite Beam Stem for Hemiarthroplasty.
Article in Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hemiarthroplasty remains the gold standard for hip fracture care in displaced intracapsular fractures. There is now substantial evidence that uncemented femoral stems are associated with higher risk of perioperative fractures. Cemented composite beam (CCB) stems offer some of the lowest overall rates of perioperative fracture risk, but are not widely used in the Irish system, and concern regarding the use of new implants and associated learning curves can act as a barrier to change. Objectives: We aim to assess our units experience transitioning to a cemented composite beam (CCB) and the associated learning curve and technical pitfalls. Design: Retrospective, single centre, single blind review identified the first 140 cases of CCB stems. Methods: Post-operative radiographs on all cases were assessed for perioperative fracture and stems were classed as being varus or valgus if the stem alignment was >3 degrees from the anatomical axis. A cemented taper slip (CTS) stem, which was in use for over 10 years in the unit, provided a control group. Results: Following introduction, higher odds of malalignment were experienced with the CCB stem (OR 2.19, 1.09-4.55 p<0.031), relative to CTS. However, compared to overall rate of malalignment in the CTS group (9.3%), the learning curve for the CCB stem was short, with rates of malalignment returning to in line with our control CTS cohort within 46 cases (Cases 1-46 32% malaligned, cases 47-92 10.86% malaligned, cases 93-138 4.34% malaligned). There was no increased risk of periprosthetic fracture demonstrated with introduction of the new stem. Conclusions: We have shown a relatively short learning curve associated with transitioning to a CCB stem for fragility fracture hemiarthroplasty. We highlight some of the early technical issues experienced and corrected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.