ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Case Report: Tailored automatic speech recognition in global aphasia with dysarthria - a single case proof of concept.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Severe dysarthria and global aphasia drastically reduce speech intelligibility, confining communication to familiar partners. Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems may show limited performance when processing such atypical speech. Objective: To determine whether a speaker-dependent Voice-Input Voice-Output Communication Aid (VIVOCA) embedded in the CapisciAMe app can decode the speech of a person with severe dysarthria and aphasia more accurately than rehabilitation professionals human listeners (RPHL). Methods: We conducted a single-case proof-of-concept study. A 34-year-old woman, 15 years post-stroke, recorded 1,120 utterances of 13 target-words across five prompting modalities. A compact convolutional neural network (cnn-trad-fpool3) was trained on these samples and evaluated on an independent set of 936 utterances. Intelligibility was benchmarked against 12 RPHL familiar with the patient. The primary outcome was word-level accuracy. Results: The tailored ASR achieved 72.65 % accuracy, outperforming familiar RPHL (mean = 56.75 %, SD = 12.91). Conclusions: A personalized ASR system can exceed the intelligibility of human listeners for profoundly disordered speech, supporting its use as an assistive communication technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.