ArticleJournal of medical signals and sensors2026
Supervised Volumetric Segmentation of White and Gray Matter from Brain Positron Emission Tomography Images Using Magnetic Resonance Labels.
Article in Journal of medical signals and sensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study evaluates the performance of five deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) for supervised segmentation of white matter (WM) and gray matter (GM) in brain positron emission tomography (PET) images using label maps derived from corresponding magnetic resonance (MR) images. The goal is to reduce dependency on hybrid PET/Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by extracting anatomical information solely from PET images, thereby providing a potential pathway for MRI-free partial volume correction (PVC). Methods: A total of 300 PET images and their corresponding MR-derived labels from the OASIS-3 dataset were used. The five DCNNs, including the UNet, RegUNet, VNet, SegResNet, and HighResNet, were implemented within the Medical Open Network for Artificial Intelligence (MONAI) framework. The networks were evaluated using Dice score and Intersection over Union (IoU) metrics. Results: Among the networks, VNet demonstrated superior performance for GM and WM segmentation, achieving Dice scores of 61.18% and 76.23%, and IoU scores of 44.15% and 61.62%, respectively. UNet and VNet showed competitive performance for WM segmentation, with no statistically significant differences between them. Conclusions: These findings provide insights into the performance of DCNNs for PET image segmentation, highlighting VNet's capability and emphasizing the potential for optimizing segmentation techniques for PVC applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.