ArticleJournal of medical signals and sensors2026
Effective Connectivity-based Unsupervised Channel Selection Method for Electroencephalography.
Article in Journal of medical signals and sensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Analyzing neural data such as electroencephalography (EEG) data often involves dealing with high-dimensional datasets, where not all channels provide equally meaningful information. Selecting the most relevant channels is crucial for improving computational efficiency and ensuring robust insights into neural dynamics. Method: This study introduces the Results: To evaluate the proposed channel selection method, we applied it to three well-known EEG datasets across four categories. The assessment involved calculating the ICEC criterion using five EC metrics: partial directed coherence (PDC), generalized PDC, renormalized PDC, directed transfer function (DTF), and direct DTF. To focus on the effect of channel selection, we employed the common spatial pattern algorithm for feature extraction and a support vector machine for classification across all participants. We compared our results against other CSP-based methods. The evaluation included comparing participant-specific accuracies with and without the proposed method across five EC metrics. Conclusion: The results showed consistent improvements and a significant reduction in the number of electrodes selected for all participants. Compared to state-of-the-art methods, our approach achieved the highest accuracies: 82% (13 out of 22 channels), 86.01% (29 out of 59 channels), and 87.56% (48 out of 118 channels) across all three datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.