ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602026
Effectiveness and safety of extended upadacitinib induction therapy in adult patients with moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis.
Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Responses to induction therapies for moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis (UC) are sufficient, but some patients benefit from prolonged induction to achieve clinical outcomes before transitioning to maintenance dosing. Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral JAK1 inhibitor, is approved in the USA for treatment of moderate-to-severe active UC non-responsive to anti-TNF therapy. However, standard 8-week induction regimen with UPA 45 mg/day may not be sufficient for some patients. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of extended UPA induction for moderate-to-severe active UC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adults with moderate-to-severe active UC who received UPA 45 mg/day beyond 8 weeks' induction. Patients with disease-related complications and those lost-to follow-up data after extended induction were excluded. Primary endpoint was clinical response (partial Mayo score (PMS) reduction by ≥ 3). Secondary endpoints included clinical remission (PMS ≤ 2), endoscopic response (Mayo endoscopic score decrease by ≥ 1), improvement in fecal calprotectin (FC) to <150 ug/dL, and specific adverse events. Results: Nine patients were included for analysis. All patients previously failed ≥ 1 biologic therapy, and 5 failed ≥ 2 biologic therapies, of which 1 also failed tofacitinib. Duration of extended UPA induction ranged from 12-24 weeks. Clinical response rate was 78% (7/9) and FC improved to <150 ug/dL in 71% (5/7). At the time of this report, 3 patients completed 12 weeks UPA induction but have not yet transitioned to maintenance therapy. Of these, 1 achieved clinical response, 1 achieved clinical remission, and 1 has planned colectomy for steroid-refractory UC. Five patients completed UPA extended induction (range 12-24 weeks) and transitioned to UPA 30 mg/day with stable clinical remission and FC <150 ug/g. Finally, 1 patient discontinued UPA induction after 16 weeks due to non-response and underwent total proctocolectomy. Adverse events included dental abscess ( Conclusion: Our retrospective study suggests extended UPA induction, from 12-24 weeks, is effective in achieving clinical response/remission in patients with moderate-to-severe active UC with a tolerable safety profile. Our clinical response/remission rates are higher than that reported for extended induction in the U-ACCOMPLISH/U-ACHIEVE clinical trials. Larger studies and longer-term follow-up are needed to examine the efficacy and safety of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.