ArticleOpen respiratory archives
[Sepsis in the Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit: Restrospective Study].
Article in Open respiratory archives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sepsis is a dysregulated response to infection that can lead to organ dysfunction and requires urgent management. Advanced respiratory support (high-flow oxygen therapy and/or non-invasive mechanical ventilation) has emerged as a therapeutic option in patients with respiratory failure. Objectives: To identify factors associated with therapeutic failure (defined as the need for invasive mechanical ventilation or death) in patients with respiratory sepsis treated in a respiratory intermediate care unit. A retrospective observational study including 47 patients admitted between January 2021 and December 2023 was conducted. Therapeutic failure was associated with elevated procalcitonin levels (p = 0.046). Lower PaO Conclusion: Advanced respiratory support could be considered a treatment option in this context. Elevated procalcitonin, hypoxemia at admission, and the need for vasopressors were associated with worse outcomes, although these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.