Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42317380›Full record

ArticleOpen respiratory archives

[BioSAT: Development and conceptual validation of a satisfaction questionnaire regarding biologic therapies for severe asthma through a structured patient-professional co-creation process].

Francisco Javier Álvarez-Gutiérrez, Marina Blanco Aparicio, Francisco Casas Maldonado, Alicia Padilla Galo, Isabel Urrutia Landa, Bárbara Melenchón, Irantzu Muerza, María Ruisánchez, Raquel Gómez, Sonia Martín

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Open respiratory archives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Francisco Javier Álvarez-GutiérrezHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, España.
Marina Blanco AparicioHospital Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, España.
Francisco Casas MaldonadoHospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, España.
Alicia Padilla GaloHospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, España.
Isabel Urrutia LandaHospital Universitario Galdakao-Usansolo, Bilbao, España.
Bárbara MelenchónAsociación de Pacientes Asma y Alergia, España.
Irantzu MuerzaAsociación de Pacientes Asma y Alergia, España.
María RuisánchezAsociación de Pacientes Asma y Alergia, España.
Raquel GómezAsociación de Pacientes Asma y Alergia, España.
Sonia MartínAsociación de Pacientes Asma y Alergia, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The benefits of biologic therapies in severe uncontrolled asthma (SUA) have primarily focused on clinical and lung function variables. However, other patient-relevant dimensions, such as confidence in treatment, comfort, or emotional impact, have been scarcely explored. The objective of this study was to develop a specific Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) questionnaire and conduct its conceptual and content validation to assess patient satisfaction. Material and methods: A sequential qualitative study following ISPOR recommendations for the development of PRO instruments. A multidisciplinary committee comprising 5 pulmonologists and 5 patients with SSEA defined the priority domains. Following iterative and structured development, the preliminary version underwent conceptual, content, and linguistic validation through cognitive interviews with 10 adult patients with SSEA treated with biologics. A qualitative analysis was performed. Results: The final questionnaire (BioSAT) consists of 10 Likert-scale items (1-5) that explore time to benefit, convenience of administration, ease of use, symptom control, adverse effects, improvement in physical activity, benefit in social relationships, emotional well-being, therapeutic trust, and experience with systemic corticosteroids. The interviews revealed adequate understanding of the questionnaire, as well as high relevance and acceptability. Conclusions: BioSAT is the first Spanish questionnaire designed to measure patient satisfaction among patients with NCSA undergoing biologic therapy. Its brevity, clinical focus, and methodological alignment with international standards position it as a useful tool in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Biologic therapiesPatient-reported outcomesPatient satisfactionQuestionnarie developmentSevere Asthma

Identifiers

PMID42317380
PMCPMC13272502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.