SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2026
Adrenal involvement in antiphospholipid syndrome and SLE-spectrum disease: a systematic review and pooled individual-patient analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adrenal involvement is a rare but potentially severe immunothrombotic manifestation of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-spectrum disease. Because the term adrenal crisis should be reserved for patients with acute adrenal insufficiency accompanied by hypotension or shock, this review distinguishes adrenal vascular injury, adrenal insufficiency, and strict adrenal crisis. Methods: We performed a systematic review and individual-patient pooled analysis of published cases of APS/SLE-spectrum adrenal involvement through March 31, 2026. The initial database search was performed from inception to February 10, 2026 and was updated through March 31, 2026. The study selection followed PRISMA 2020 principles, and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261298329). Published patients were harmonized for diagnosis stratum, precipitating trigger, adrenal imaging phenotype, adrenal insufficiency chronology, immunologic profile, thrombotic burden, treatment/follow-up variables, CAPS presentation context, and outcomes. Results: A total of 103 studies comprising 155 published patients were included; 143 entered the main analysis set. The median age was 43.8 years, 49.0% were female, and primary APS accounted for 67.1% of the main cohort. Hemorrhage-dominant adrenal injury was the leading imaging phenotype (66.9%), bilateral adrenal involvement was highly prevalent (86.3% of informative cases), and adrenal insufficiency was the first manifestation in 73.6% of informative cases. Among codable main-analysis cases, hypotension was documented in 60/125 (48.0%), strict adrenal crisis in 64/124 (51.6%), hyponatremia in 47/142 (33.1%), and hyperkalemia in 57/134 (42.5%). CAPS was treated as a presentation/severity context rather than as a downstream consequence and was reported in 59.8% of evaluable patients. Conclusion: Adrenal involvement in APS and lupus-spectrum disease is a heterogeneous but clinically recognizable high-risk phenotype characterized by bilateral adrenal injury, hemorrhagic predominance, frequent sentinel presentation as adrenal insufficiency, and substantial CAPS burden. Careful terminology helps separate adrenal vascular injury, adrenal insufficiency, and strict adrenal crisis while preserving the need for urgent endocrine rescue and systemic thrombotic evaluation. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420261298329.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.