ArticleSchizophrenia research. Cognition2026
Comparative profiles of anomalous self-experiences and social cognition in clinical high risk for psychosis and autism spectrum disorder.
Article in Schizophrenia research. Cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Self-disorders, or anomalous disturbances in the basic sense of self, have been described in psychosis-risk states and may contribute to social cognitive impairment and functioning. This study examined self-disorder severity and associations with social cognition and functioning across individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and controls. ASD was included due to overlapping difficulties in social cognition/functioning with CHR-P. We hypothesized a graded pattern of self-disorders (CHR-P > ASD > controls) and stronger associations between self-disorders and social cognition in CHR-P. Methods: We included 39 CHR-P, 39 ASD, and 30 controls (mean age ≈24 years; 51% female). Self-disorders were assessed with the Inventory of Psychotic-Like Anomalous Self-Experiences (IPASE). Social cognitive domains included social cognitive bias and theory of mind alongside measures of social functioning. Analyses of covariance and bootstrapped regression models with IPASE as predictor were used, adjusting for age, sex, and IQ. Multiple comparisons were Benjamini-Hochberg corrected. Results: Self-disorders followed a graded distribution (CHR-P > ASD > controls) across all IPASE subscores. Both clinical groups showed elevated social cognitive bias and reduced social functioning compared to controls. Self-disorders were associated with social cognitive bias in ASD (B = 0.392, 95%CI 0.236-0.544, Conclusion: Self-disorders showed a graded distribution across groups but was only associated with social cognitive deficits in ASD. Findings suggest that shared symptom profiles may reflect divergent experiential processes across groups. Further research is needed to clarify clinical implications and generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.