Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42317293›Full record

ArticleFood technology and biotechnology

Preservation of Raw

Fabiele Bernardi, Felipe Matarazzo Suplicy, Robson Ventura de Souza, Luiza Tiemi Morikawa Shiose, Marilia Miotto, Giustino Tribuzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food technology and biotechnology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fabiele BernardiDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Admar Gonzaga Highway, n.1346, Florianópolis, SC 88034-000, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7981-9681
Felipe Matarazzo SuplicyCenter for Aquaculture and Fisheries Development, Agricultural Research and Rural Extension Company of Santa Catarina, Admar Gonzaga Highway, n.1188, Florianópolis, SC 88034-000, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3698-6927
Robson Ventura de SouzaCenter for Aquaculture and Fisheries Development, Agricultural Research and Rural Extension Company of Santa Catarina, Admar Gonzaga Highway, n.1188, Florianópolis, SC 88034-000, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0588-0038
Luiza Tiemi Morikawa ShioseDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Admar Gonzaga Highway, n.1346, Florianópolis, SC 88034-000, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8202-4649
Marilia MiottoDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Admar Gonzaga Highway, n.1346, Florianópolis, SC 88034-000, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8972-7104
Giustino TribuziDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Admar Gonzaga Highway, n.1346, Florianópolis, SC 88034-000, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6560-4652

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research background: Oysters have high nutritional value; however, their short shelf life limits their commercialisation to areas close to production sites. Affordable and accessible processing techniques that extend shelf life could expand both market reach and consumer access to oysters. This study evaluates the physicochemical, microbiological and sensory properties of raw Experimental approach: Aliquots of (100±2) g of raw oyster meat were placed into plastic containers containing different solutions: sterile deionised water only (negative control treatment, labelled W), base solution (NaCl, 5 % Results and conclusions: Incorporating weak acids into the marination solutions effectively inhibited the growth of mesophilic and psychrotrophic bacteria in semi-preserved oysters during 16 days of refrigerated storage. In contrast, water and NaCl treatments exceeded the recommended limit of 5 log CFU/g for seafood after 3 and 11 days, respectively. By day 16, total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N) values indicated early spoilage in water ((30.0±1.1) mg/100 g), satisfactory freshness in NaCl ((24.5±2.6) mg/100 g) and CA ((18.3±1.1) mg/100 g), and excellent freshness in LA ((14.7±0.0) mg/100 g) and AA ((15.0±1.8) mg/100 g). Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) assay values, expressed as malondialdehyde (MDA), remained below 3 mg/kg in all treatments, indicating good oxidative stability. Among the acids, AA maintained higher pH values (3.78 on day 16) than CA (3.26) and LA (3.14) and showed the lowest microbial loads; however, it received the highest scores for acid odour (median=5.35) and the lowest for characteristic oyster odour. CA and LA produced sensory profiles more similar to fresh oysters, with higher characteristic odour scores and lower acid odour scores, but slightly higher spoiled odour scores (still low in absolute terms). Overall, AA was the most effective for microbiological and physicochemical preservation, while CA and LA offered better sensory acceptance. These results highlight the potential of weak organic acids, particularly AA, as a low-cost method to extend the shelf life of raw oysters to at least 16 days under refrigeration. Novelty and scientific contribution: This study evaluates the effects of marination with weak acids on the physicochemical, microbiological, and sensory properties of raw oyster meat. The wide range of parameters analysed highlights not only its suitability for consumption but also consumer preferences based on sensory aspects such as colour and odour. The combined findings can assist the industry in selecting the most appropriate acid for developing different oyster-based products.

Indexed as

bivalve molluscsoyster meatsemi-preserved productssensory analysisshelf lifeshellfish consumption

Identifiers

PMID42317293
PMCPMC13275097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.