ArticleInfectious Disease Modelling2026
Dynamics of infectious disease spread between transportation hubs and surrounding communities.
Article in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urban transit systems, particularly those in major metropolitan areas, are becoming increasingly interconnected, making it essential to better understand passenger mobility and its implications for the spread of infectious diseases. Respiratory infectious diseases, including COVID-19 (as a case study), can spread rapidly in densely populated urban environments, particularly within public transportation systems. This study investigates the dynamics of infection spread at a subway station, and its surrounding community, focusing on both short-term and long-term transmission. Using two deterministic ordinary differential equation (ODE) models, we simulate disease transmission over a single business day and examine how daily encounters impact infection numbers over the subsequent three months. The short-term model captures localized interactions between transit passengers and community residents, while the long-term model evaluates the cumulative impact of these encounters on community infections. Parameter estimation was performed using ridership data and the least squares method. Results suggest that mobility-related factors, particularly inflow and outflow rates, have a greater impact on controlling disease spread than transmission rates in both short- and long-term dynamics. Reducing inflow eases congestion and lowers encounters in the hub but increases encounters in the community, whereas reducing outflow increases crowding in the hub while decreasing encounters in the community. Joint reductions in inflow and outflow decrease encounters in both settings. In the long term, changes in transmission rates have only a limited effect on peak infections, while reducing outflow notably decreases infections and reducing inflow slightly increases community infections. Overall, simultaneously reducing inflow and outflow is the most effective strategy for limiting encounters in the short term and infections in the long term.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.