ArticleEcology and evolution2026
Mammal Community Responses to Increasing Puma Activity in a Suburban Preserve.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mammal Community Responses to Increasing Puma Activity in a Suburban Preserve.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predators can shape ecosystems by directly reducing prey abundance and inducing fear-driven changes in the behaviour of their prey and mesopredators, with potential cascading effects on lower trophic levels. However, these effects have been studied in landscapes with relatively low human presence. While some predator species coexist with people in human-dominated landscapes, it remains unclear whether predators can fulfil their prey regulation functions in such environments. In a suburban preserve in the San Francisco Bay Area, USA, puma activity increased over nine years. We investigated if this increasing puma activity affected mesopredators (bobcats, coyotes and grey foxes), prey (black-tailed deer and brush rabbits) and woody plants at a local scale using evidence from three analyses. First, convergent cross mapping analysis indicated that pumas influenced longitudinal changes in prey and mesopredator activity. Second, daily activity pattern analysis showed that prey and mesopredators decreased nocturnality, potentially to avoid pumas. Third, limited plant community sampling (three surveys during a 17-year period) revealed that woody plant density increased as puma activity increased. Collectively, these analyses provided corroborating, preliminary signals that increasing puma activity coincided with changes in bobcats, coyotes and deer. However, inferences about any effects on foxes, rabbits and woody plants remain provisional and warrant stronger empirical confirmation. Nonetheless, as humans and predators increasingly overlap spatially, ensuring that large predators can persist and function ecologically in human-dominated landscapes is a growing conservation priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.