Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42317246›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Mammal Community Responses to Increasing Puma Activity in a Suburban Preserve.

Chinmay Sonawane, Kevin Leempoel, Nicole Nova, Jordana M Meyer, Trevor Hébert, Amelia Zuckerwise, Rodolfo Dirzo, Elizabeth A Hadly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chinmay SonawaneDepartment of Biology Stanford University Stanford California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0327-386X
Kevin LeempoelDepartment of Biology Stanford University Stanford California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7335-7930
Nicole NovaDepartment of Biology Stanford University Stanford California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8585-1215
Jordana M MeyerDepartment of Biology Stanford University Stanford California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2578-4417
Trevor HébertJasper Ridge Biological Preserve ('Ootchamin 'Ooyakma) Stanford University Stanford California USA.
Amelia ZuckerwiseDepartment of Biology Stanford University Stanford California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0028-7980
Rodolfo DirzoDepartment of Biology Stanford University Stanford California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5751-9888
Elizabeth A HadlyDepartment of Biology Stanford University Stanford California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8227-8967

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predators can shape ecosystems by directly reducing prey abundance and inducing fear-driven changes in the behaviour of their prey and mesopredators, with potential cascading effects on lower trophic levels. However, these effects have been studied in landscapes with relatively low human presence. While some predator species coexist with people in human-dominated landscapes, it remains unclear whether predators can fulfil their prey regulation functions in such environments. In a suburban preserve in the San Francisco Bay Area, USA, puma activity increased over nine years. We investigated if this increasing puma activity affected mesopredators (bobcats, coyotes and grey foxes), prey (black-tailed deer and brush rabbits) and woody plants at a local scale using evidence from three analyses. First, convergent cross mapping analysis indicated that pumas influenced longitudinal changes in prey and mesopredator activity. Second, daily activity pattern analysis showed that prey and mesopredators decreased nocturnality, potentially to avoid pumas. Third, limited plant community sampling (three surveys during a 17-year period) revealed that woody plant density increased as puma activity increased. Collectively, these analyses provided corroborating, preliminary signals that increasing puma activity coincided with changes in bobcats, coyotes and deer. However, inferences about any effects on foxes, rabbits and woody plants remain provisional and warrant stronger empirical confirmation. Nonetheless, as humans and predators increasingly overlap spatially, ensuring that large predators can persist and function ecologically in human-dominated landscapes is a growing conservation priority.

Indexed as

behaviourcamera trappingecology of fearmesopredatorpredatorPuma concolor

Identifiers

PMID42317246
PMCPMC13274232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.