Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42317242›Full record

ArticleSAGE open nursing

Navigating Political Mischaracterization of DEI in the U.S. Nursing Profession.

Simon Paul P Navarro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Simon Paul P NavarroSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are essential principles in the healthcare landscape, particularly in the nursing profession, aimed at reducing systemic inequities, improving representation, and strengthening fair opportunities across nursing education, workforce development, and clinical practice. However, the current U.S. political climate has posed challenges to the value of DEI by dismissing its ethical imperatives and disavowing the evidence that equity initiatives function as intended. This commentary examines how the politically motivated opposition and mischaracterization of DEI specifically affect the U.S. nursing workforce, workplace dynamics, and patient care delivery. The article argues that a coordinated, practice-focused response grounded in nursing ethics and empirical evidence is vital to preserve equitable care standards and support the well-being of nurses from underrepresented backgrounds. While this commentary centers on the U.S. context, the tensions described mirror challenges confronting health systems globally, making the discourse broadly relevant.

Indexed as

academiadiversityequityhospitalsinclusionnursingpolicies

Identifiers

PMID42317242
PMCPMC13272974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.