ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Quantitative rapid image-based method for coronary artery blood flow and wall shear stress extraction.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper shows that it is possible to quickly determine the velocity field of coronary blood flow and wall shear stress using a very fast image-based approach on a routine coronary angiogram, which is an alternative approach to reconstructing a target arterial model and performing time-consuming computational fluid dynamics simulations. The method analyzes two frames from a short contrast washout sequence acquired 0.1 s apart and applies a convection-dominant transport model to estimate local projected velocity and instantaneous projected wall shear stress. In four patients with stenoses in the middle third of the left anterior descending coronary artery, the peak wall shear stress within the stenotic segment showed a mean relative difference of 10.3% compared with a same-geometry two-dimensional ANSYS computational fluid dynamics reference. These results suggest that rapid image-only wall shear stress estimation may be used as an adjunctive hemodynamic assessment tool to provide additional information to clinicians when time is critical. However, further studies are still needed for broader validation and for evaluation at multiple time points during the cardiac cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.