Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42317223›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2026

Awareness, Knowledge, and Perceived Feasibility of World Health Organization Labour Care Guide Among Midwives in Enugu State, Nigeria.

Ukah Cynthia Chinonso, Majani Edward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ukah Cynthia ChinonsoDepartment of Nursing Sciences University of Nigeria Enugu Campus Enugu State Nigeria.
Majani EdwardDepartment of Public Health St. Francis University College of Health and Allied Sciences Ifakara Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1671-9584

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Labour-related complications remain a major contributor to maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, especially in low-resource settings. To improve labour monitoring and outcomes, the World Health Organization (WHO) introduced the Labour Care Guide (LCG) in 2020 to replace the traditional partograph. However, its adoption and understanding among midwives, who are frontline providers of maternity care, remain uncertain. Aims: To assess the knowledge and perceived feasibility of the WHO Labour Care Guide among midwives in Enugu State, Nigeria. Materials and Methods: Analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 43 midwives working in public health facilities in Enugu. Data were collected using a structured, self-administered questionnaire and analysed using SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the data, and associations were tested using Fisher's exact tests, with a significance level set at Results: Awareness of the LCG was reported by 30 midwives (69.8%). Among them, 16 (37.2%) had poor knowledge, and only 10 (33.3%) perceived it as highly feasible for routine use. Twenty-nine (96.7%) midwives incorrectly believed that the LCG includes alert/action lines and key barriers to its implementation included perceived complexity, time consumption, insufficient training, and staff shortages. Years of experience were not significantly associated with knowledge of LCG ( Conclusion: Despite a relatively high level of awareness, substantial knowledge gaps and negative perceptions of its feasibility persist among midwives regarding the LCG. The tool is not currently in routine use in Enugu. There is a need for intensified training efforts, inclusion of the LCG in pre-service midwifery curricula, and supportive policy measures to promote its effective implementation.

Identifiers

PMID42317223
PMCPMC13272890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.