ArticleHealth science reports2026
Investigating the Outcomes of Advanced Neonatal Resuscitation in Preterm Neonates: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Iran.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Given the higher need for advanced resuscitation methods at birth in premature neonates, it is crucial to identify the associated consequences. Due to a lack of data in this area, we aimed to investigate the association of advanced neonatal resuscitation at birth with the short-term prognosis of preterm neonates. Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined premature neonates with gestational age < 33 weeks born at Vali-e-Asr Hospital, Tehran, Iran, during the years 2020-2021. Advanced resuscitation included endotracheal intubation, chest compression, or epinephrine injection. The primary outcome was neonatal death within 28 days, with secondary outcomes including other adverse events. Statistical analyses included Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and independent Results: Of the 444 neonates studied, 224 received advanced resuscitation (intervention group), and 220 did not (control group). Neonatal death was significantly higher in the intervention group (26.8% vs. 7.7%; Conclusion: While a higher incidence of adverse outcomes was observed in premature neonates who received advanced resuscitation, this finding should be interpreted with caution. It suggests that careful attention to the indications for advanced resuscitation, along with structured follow-up of survivors, may be appropriate given their potentially elevated risk of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.