ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2026
Grisotti versus Wise-Pattern Oncoplastic Reconstruction in Central Breast Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Article in European journal of breast health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Central breast tumors requiring excision of the nipple-areola complex present a reconstructive challenge in breast-conserving surgery. Volume-displacement oncoplastic techniques, including the Grisotti flap and reduction-based Wise-pattern reconstruction, allow breast preservation while maintaining oncological safety. This study compares the short-term oncological and aesthetic outcomes of these two techniques. Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted, enrolling 40 patients with centrally located breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery between March 2023 and November 2024. Patients were randomized to reconstruction using either the Grisotti technique ( Results: Mean tumor size was 3.2±1.5 cm in the Grisotti group and 2.6±0.8 cm in the Wise-pattern group ( Conclusion: Both the Grisotti and Wise-pattern techniques demonstrated comparable short-term oncological safety and satisfactory aesthetic outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for central breast tumors. Differences in patient and surgeon satisfaction did not reach statistical significance. The Grisotti technique is most suitable for patients with small-to-moderate breast volumes and mild-to-moderate ptosis, while the Wise-pattern technique offers advantages in macromastia, significant ptosis, or when contralateral symmetrisation is planned. These findings support individualized technique selection based on breast volume and anatomical considerations, while highlighting the need for larger studies with longer follow-up to assess long-term oncological and aesthetic outcomes, and prospective use of validated aesthetic outcome instruments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.