Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42317020›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2026

Survey of the Senologic International Society (SIS) on the Use of Preoperative Breast MRI in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Global Perspective on Current Practice.

Alexander Mundinger, Carolin Mundinger, Darius Dian, Thorsten Heilmann, Shigeru Imoto, Atilla Soran, Wendie A Berg, Tolga Ozmen, Mitsuhiro Tozaki, Katja Siegmann-Luz and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of breast health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Alexander MundingerBreast Center Osnabrück; Niels-Stensen-Kliniken, Franziskus-Hospital Harderberg, Georgsmarienhütte, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4111-0906
Carolin MundingerDepartment of Behavioural Biology, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3776-4090
Darius DianGyn-Munich and AWOgyn, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0981-4118
Thorsten HeilmannBreast Center Osnabrück; Niels-Stensen-Kliniken, Franziskus-Hospital Harderberg, Georgsmarienhütte, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6401-8416
Shigeru ImotoKyorin University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0878-7851
Atilla SoranMagee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3398-7230
Wendie A BergDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8792-6185
Tolga OzmenDivision of Gastrointestinal and Oncologic Surgery, Section of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7136-6195
Mitsuhiro TozakiDepartment of Radiology, Sagara Hospital Affiliated Breast Center, Kagoshima, Japan.ORCID 0009-0001-3234-5041
Katja Siegmann-LuzReference Center Mammography, Berlin, Germany.
Ayfer Kamali PolatDepartment of Surgery, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-6414-9435
Salete de Jesus Fonseca RêgoDepartment of Radiology, Antonio Pedro University, Fluminense/UFF, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0003-1094-4937
Pieter De VisschereDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4842-7877
Sylvia H Heywang-KöbrunnerReference Center, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4852-0289
Dionysios KoufoudakisBreast Center Nicosia General Hospital, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Bolivar Arboleda-OsorioUniversidad Central del Caribe School of Medicine, Puerto Rico, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8789-0824
Maurício Magalhães CostaNational Academy of Medicine, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8094-5511
Tadeusz PieńkowskiDepartment of Oncology and Breast Disease, Postgraduate Medical Education Center, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0110-5950
Paula PodolskiCroatian Senologic Society, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-9922-1086
Vahit Ozmenİstanbul Florence Nightingale Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2973-8247
Schlomo SchneebaumDepartment of Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-7560-5635
Constanze ElfgenBreast Center Zurich, Switzerland, University of Witten/Herdecke, Department for Human Medicine, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6092-6612
Lydia Ioannidou-MouzakaHellenic Senologic Society, Athens, Greece.
Marianna TelescaWorcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1490-9605
Manisha BahlMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7728-7690
Makus Müller-SchimpfleDepartment of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Frankfurt Höchst Clinics GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany.
Vaidotas CesnaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-4719-8483
Siarhei KharuzhykDepartment of Radiology, N.N. Alexandrov National Cancer Centre, Department of Radiodiagnostics, Institute of Posgraduate Education, Belarusian State Medical University, Minsk, Belarus.ORCID 0000-0002-0010-8324
Carole MathelinInstitut de Cancérologie Strasbourg, Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7680-0210

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To map global practice patterns and disparities in the use of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for early breast cancer (EBC) among members of the Senologic International Society (SIS) and SIS Working Group. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was distributed to SIS members worldwide. The questionnaire captured respondent demographics, center characteristics, local/national breast MRI use, guideline perceptions and personal practice, specific indications for MRI, and decision-making influences. Results: We analyzed 114 responses from 17 countries. Significant variations were observed. While 36/46 (78.3%) of Japanese respondents perceived national guidelines as recommending preoperative MRI, only 18/60 (30%) of Europeans did. Overall, 96/114 (84.2%) of all respondents believed preoperative MRI provided a patient benefit, with none believing it caused harm. The most frequent indications in the total cohort were invasive lobular carcinoma (106/114, 93.0%), mammographic/sonographic suspicion of multifocality/multicentricity (96/114, 84.2%) and planned neoadjuvant therapy (89/114, 78.1%), while in Japan ductal carcinoma Conclusion: This SIS-based international survey revealed heterogeneous global adoption of preoperative breast MRI for EBC, highlighting a significant gap between evidence-based guidelines and real-world practice. Clinical decisions are heavily influenced by geography, culture and resources, and belief in patient benefit. These findings highlight the need to tailor guidelines to local contexts, and strengthen awareness and dissemination efforts, together with further research to clarify the role of MRI in the modern multidisciplinary management of EBC.

Indexed as

Early breast cancerguidelinesinternational surveymagnetic resonance imagingpractice patternspreoperative staging

Identifiers

PMID42317020
PMCPMC13280615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.