ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2026
Development and Internal Validation of a Clinical Data-Based Machine Learning Web Calculator for Predicting Recurrence in Granulomatous Lobular Mastitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Article in European journal of breast health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Granulomatous lobular mastitis (GLM) is a disease characterized by a high recurrence rate and the absence of a standard treatment, making prognostic prediction crucial. While promising, existing machine learning models are limited by single-center data and small sample sizes. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models using a large multicenter dataset to predict GLM recurrence and build a clinical web calculator. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data from 318 GLM patients at two tertiary hospitals (diagnosed between 2019 and 2024) were used to train and evaluate five machine learning models. Performance was assessed by accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), F1-score, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: The five models demonstrated comparable discriminatory performance, with AUCs ranging from 0.778 to 0.808 and no statistically significant differences among them. Among them, random forest (RF) excelled in composite and sensitivity metrics (F1 score: 0.639; accuracy: 76.2%; sensitivity: 50%), whereas logistic regression achieved the top AUC (0.808), and the support vector machine achieved the best specificity (95.3%). Based on its balanced performance across multiple metrics, RF was selected for deployment to develop a publicly accessible web application platform (https://w12251393.shinyapps.io/predictGLM/). In the RF model, white blood cell count emerged as the top predictor, followed by age at diagnosis, the origin of the primary tumor, surgical excision, antitubercular therapy, corticosteroid therapy, and abscess drainage, in descending order of importance. Conclusion: Although retrospective in design, this study developed a multicenter RF model and implemented it as an accessible web calculator, providing a valuable tool for personalized recurrence prediction and treatment decision-making in GLM. The model should be used as a risk stratification aid to support clinical decision-making rather than as a definitive predictive instrument.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.