ArticleThe Australian journal of rural health2026
Development of an Illustrative Conceptual Model to Promote Rural Research Capacity Building Efforts by Embedded Researchers.
Article in The Australian journal of rural health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reflections on the Evolving Contribution of the Rural Health Multidisciplinary Training Programme.The Australian journal of rural health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
problemThe Rural Health Academic Network aims to build research capacity through partnering with rural health services. However, describing its work and achievements is difficult. This paper presents the development of an illustrative conceptual model (the model) to promote the Network within rural healthcare.
settingThe Network was introduced by a university department of rural health in 2006. Currently, research coordinators are embedded in four rural health services in northern Victoria, Australia. MEASURES FOR IMPROVEMENT: The model development was informed by an established checklist for reporting Theory of Change concepts in public health interventions. STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE: Commencing in 2021, collaborative, interdisciplinary group discussions initiated the model design. These involved the research coordinators and university supervisors. EFFECTS OF CHANGE: The model describes the 'what' and 'how' of the Network, conceptualised through strategies, outputs, expected outcomes (short, medium, long-term), and desired impacts. Examples from the four sites emphasise the diverse contexts, the importance of partnerships and collaboration, and the dynamic nature of the work. LESSONS LEARNT: Sharing the development of the model highlights the benefits of applying a common understanding of building research capacity. It acknowledges the challenges of reporting impact as a rural research collective involving multiple unique sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.