Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42316937›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

Exploring Patient and Caregiver Work and Continuity of Care During Hospital-to-Home Transitions of Care in the Canadian Context.

Hardeep Singh, Michelle L A Nelson, Terence Tang, Kerry Kuluski, Anie Udofia, Hedieh Molla Ghanbari, Ingryd Cunha Ventura Felipe, Jason Nie, Kednapa Thavorn, Robert J Reid and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04287192 (Digital Bridge), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04287192 narecruitingnot on this map

Digital Bridge: Using Technology to Support Patient-centered Care Transitions From Hospital to Home

TypeinterventionalSponsorMount Sinai Hospital, CanadaRan2023 to 2026Enrolled640ConditionsOlder Adults With Complex Care NeedsArmsDigital Bridge:Tool Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hardeep SinghDepartment of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7429-5580
Michelle L A NelsonBruyère Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Terence TangInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Kerry KuluskiInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anie UdofiaDesign (MDes), OCAD University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hedieh Molla GhanbariDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ingryd Cunha Ventura FelipeScience of Care Institute, Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jason NieInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Kednapa ThavornOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4738-8447
Robert J ReidInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9008-6375
Walter WodchisInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2494-7031
Carolyn Steele GrayInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Canada Research Chairs programmeCanadian Institute for Health Research FRN-165733Dr. Mathias Gysler Research Chair in Patient & Family Centred CareHeart & Stroke Foundation of CanadaTrillium Health Partners Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients and caregivers are expected to engage in work that involves both physical and cognitive tasks to manage their care and well-being during hospital-to-home transitions. Patient and caregiver work is defined as the health-related tasks they must manage, as well as the physical and cognitive effort required to complete those tasks. When continuity of care is well-supported, work for patients and caregivers may be reduced or better managed. However, there is a need to better understand how continuity of care affects patients' and caregivers' work to optimise their outcomes.

objectiveTo explore the work undertaken by patients and caregivers during hospital-to-home transitions in Ontario, Canada, and examine how different dimensions of continuity impact this work.

designThis qualitative interpretive description study engaged older adults (60+) who self-reported complex care needs and had ≥ 1 hospital-to-home care transition, and caregivers supporting these transitions in a semi-structured, audio-recorded interview. A framework analysis integrating inductive and deductive coding, based on Patient Work and Continuity of Care models, was used to analyse the data.

resultsTen participants were interviewed: four caregivers, five patients and one individual who identified as both patient and caregiver. Two themes were generated: (1) physical and cognitive work performed by patients and caregivers during hospital-to-home transitions, and (2) how informational, management and relational continuity impact patient and caregiver work.

conclusionWhile all patient and caregiver work cannot be eliminated, their tasks may be reduced or better supported through improvements in continuity. By clarifying physical and cognitive work tasks and interpreting them through the lens of continuity of care, we were able to distil work into nine challenges that support translation of these themes into actionable interventions. Interventions that strengthen information transfer, clarify care plans, and provide targeted training and resources have the potential to lessen avoidable workload and improve transition experiences for patients and caregivers with complex care needs. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: An advisory committee of patients with complex care needs and caregivers informed data collection (e.g., reviewed interview guide) and study output (vignette video). CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04287192; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04287192.

Indexed as

CaregiversContinuity of Patient CareHome Care ServicesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedOntarioQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID42316937
PMCPMC13280220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.