ReviewJournal of medical radiation sciences2026
Prognostic Value of Combined FDG PET and MRI Analysis of Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAccurate risk stratification in cervical cancer remains challenging, and imaging biomarkers may add prognostic value beyond staging. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the published data on the integrated use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cervical cancer, with a specific analysis of the correlation between functional and anatomical imaging parameters and the identification of prognostic imaging markers.
methodsA comprehensive database search was conducted to identify studies that examined functional and anatomical imaging parameters using PET and MRI in the analysis of cervical cancer. A total of 328 articles were screened, and 107 full-text articles were reviewed. 34 studies were ultimately included in the systematic review.
resultsThirty Four papers were reviewed for systematic review. Key functional and anatomical imaging parameters were analysed. 11 papers analysed PET standardised uptake value (SUV) and MRI apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) correlations which were suitable for meta-analysis. Moderate negative correlations between SUV and ADC values were statistically significant across multiple studies. Furthermore, metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were shown to be statistically correlated with tumour grade, FIGO staging and survival outcomes (disease-free survival, DFS, and overall survival, OS). Imaging parameters predictive of local recurrence, metastatic disease and survival outcomes were analysed.
conclusionThis systematic review of 34 studies on FDG PET and MRI in cervical cancer shows that imaging biomarkers predict recurrence, metastasis, and outcomes. Collectively, the literature supports the potential role of integrated PET/MRI biomarkers for improved prognostic stratification beyond conventional staging systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.