Trial reportJournal of the International AIDS Society2026
A Urine Tenofovir Point-of-Care Assay Facilitates Positive Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence Discussions Among People Living With HIV and Healthcare Providers-A Mixed-Methods Evaluation in Cape Town, South Africa.
Trial report in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIn South Africa, antiretroviral therapy adherence monitoring relies on self-reported adherence, which is prone to recall error, and only verified annually during blood viral load measurement. A novel urine tenofovir rapid assay (UTRA) is a low-cost point-of-care adherence support tool for people living with HIV (PLHIV). Nested in an effectiveness randomized trial, we aimed to understand the relative acceptability of adherence support experiences among PLHIV receiving the UTRA point-of-care adherence intervention versus standard of care.
methodsAll trial participants (n = 199) completed a brief, repeat-measures, quantitative acceptability questionnaire at months 3, 6 and 12. We also conducted longitudinal in-depth interviews with 25 PLHIV with three interactions per participant over 52 weeks-a total of 75 interviews. Interviewed PLHIV were purposively sampled for balance by arm, diversity in age and gender, rich-case sampling, and saturation. We also conducted once-off in-depth interviews with five healthcare providers administering the UTRA intervention. Data were collected between May 2022 and June 2024. Qualitative data analysis involved descriptive summaries of key emergent themes with illustrative case examples augmented by descriptive statistics from the questionnaires.
resultsParticipants in the intervention arm reported that being tested and informed about their adherence levels in real-time served as a reminder to take treatment consistently. The UTRA facilitated conversations between PLHIV and healthcare providers on how to overcome barriers to adherence. Participants in the control arm reported that they relied on relatives for adherence support and accountability because there is limited time for adherence discussions with healthcare providers. Healthcare providers reported that providing adherence counselling to PLHIV receiving standard of care was challenging because they relied on voluntary disclosure of adherence interruptions. PLHIV in the intervention arm reported more positive experiences of adherence support compared to those in the control arm, regardless of their adherence practices.
conclusionsA point-of-care adherence tool like the UTRA provides a much-needed platform for PLHIV and healthcare providers to discuss adherence practices and challenges. PLHIV preferred this style of adherence support compared to the standard of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.