ArticlePrimary health care research & development2026
'They're waiting for us to break before they listen': healthcare workers' perspectives on how to mitigate moral distress in British Columbia, Canada.
Article in Primary health care research & development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesMoral distress among healthcare workers can have serious repercussions, including reduced morale, decreased quality of care, apathy, burnout, and workforce attrition. While much research has documented moral distress, few studies have considered how to effectively mitigate it. This study sought to enhance understanding of moral distress by exploring not only who is affected and why, but also examining strategies for addressing it.
methodsAn online survey was conducted with primary care healthcare professionals in British Columbia, Canada, from October to December 2022, including physicians, nurses, homecare aides, and long-term care aides. The survey gathered sociodemographic data, documented experiences of moral distress, and explored methods used to mitigate it. We specifically analysed responses to two open-ended questions on how respondents addressed moral distress, categorizing responses by profession, gender, and racial identity.
resultsEmploying a socio-ecological framework, we organized mitigation strategies across four levels: individual, interpersonal, community/organizational, and societal/systemic. Strategies ranged from personal coping mechanisms - such as mindfulness and exercise - to more collective actions aimed at changing workplace culture and policies. At the organizational and systemic levels, participants offered recommendations for structural reforms to improve support for healthcare staff.
conclusionThis study highlights the multifactorial nature of moral distress, showing that it arises from a complex interplay of systemic, organizational, interpersonal, and individual factors. Our findings emphasize the importance of developing multi-level approaches to mitigate moral distress in healthcare, addressing both immediate individual needs and broader organizational and policy changes that promote a healthier work environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.