ArticleJournal of proteome research2026
Donor-Independent Metabolomics Enables Bloodstain Age Determination at Crime Scenes.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Determining when bloodstains were deposited remains an unsolved challenge in forensic science, limiting investigators' ability to reconstruct events and verify suspect timelines. Here, we develop a metabolomics-based approach combining liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) with machine learning to estimate bloodstain age independent of donor-specific variation. Through untargeted analysis and degradation studies, we identified 51 time-dependent biomarkers and transformed their intensities into stable ratios that normalize for individual differences and blood volume. Using samples collected under controlled environmental conditions, we achieve high accuracy for forensically relevant timeframes with prediction errors of ∼7 h for fresh bloodstains and near-perfect classification of samples as recent (<60 h) or aged (>60 h). Validation on two independent data sets confirms strong performance under typical indoor conditions, while highlighting sensitivity to extreme environmental fluctuations. By addressing key biological and technical sources of variability that have hindered translation to practice, this study establishes a robust analytical framework for bloodstain age estimation. The approach offers a practical foundation for future operational implementation and has the potential to substantially improve forensic timeline reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.