ArticleJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS2026
Randomized controlled trial of Understanding Social Situations versus problem-solving training in improving social function in people with psychosis.
Article in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPoor social function in people with psychosis has been linked to impairments in social cognition and neurocognition, which in turn have been identified as promising treatment targets. We developed a novel social cognitive intervention, Understanding Social Situations (USS), that minimizes cognitive load by leveraging delivery methods common to cognitive rehabilitation. USS focuses on making good judgments about what others may be feeling and thinking, and how they might respond in various social scenarios. In the current trial, we evaluated the efficacy of USS versus an active control.
methods103 Veterans with psychotic spectrum disorders were randomized to two months of USS training or a problem-solving training matched for nonspecific treatment factors. Comprehensive assessments included clinician-aided self-report social functioning, social skills performance, and pre/post/follow-up ecological momentary assessments about the extent and quality of social interactions.
resultsParticipants in USS had significant within but not between group improvements on a clinician-aided self-report measure of social function. Social skills performance did not change for either condition. Momentary assessments revealed no change in frequency of social contacts, but those in the USS condition showed within-group improvements on comfort level during current social interactions and anticipated positive appraisals of future interactions. Those randomized to problem-solving training had significantly greater improvements in depression at post-training.
conclusionsMore rigorous trials are needed evaluating the impact of social cognitive interventions on real-world social functioning. It may be particularly important to link interventions to lived social experience and to assess the quality of social interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.