Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42316540›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical nursing2026

The Experience of Care in People With Palliative Needs and Their Families: A Qualitative Metasynthesis.

Ana Gil Méndez, Caterina Checa Jiménez, Ingrid Bullich Marín, Laura Navarrete Reyes, Carolina Watson Badia, Nina Granel Gimenez, Lídia Ribera Barberan, Mireia Subirana Casacuberta, Juan M Leyva-Moral

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ana Gil MéndezNursing Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6888-189X
Caterina Checa JiménezNursing Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0399-0532
Ingrid Bullich MarínGrup de Recerca Infermera Taulí Per Cuidar, Atraure i Transformar (RIT-CAT), Institut D'investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT), Sabadell, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9745-4505
Laura Navarrete ReyesGrup de Recerca Infermera Taulí Per Cuidar, Atraure i Transformar (RIT-CAT), Institut D'investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT), Sabadell, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9750-6048
Carolina Watson BadiaGrup de Recerca Infermera en Vulnerabilitat i Salut (GRIVIS), Nursing Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6237-7717
Nina Granel GimenezGrup de Recerca Infermera en Vulnerabilitat i Salut (GRIVIS), Nursing Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7404-0564
Lídia Ribera BarberanHospital Universitario Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain.
Mireia Subirana CasacubertaNursing Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1577-4159
Juan M Leyva-MoralGrup de Recerca Infermera en Vulnerabilitat i Salut (GRIVIS), Nursing Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4241-4992

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo synthesise and reinterpret qualitative evidence on how people with palliative care needs and their family caregivers experience the care process.

backgroundPalliative care aims to provide holistic, person- and family-centred care. Although qualitative research has explored multiple aspects of end-of-life care, existing knowledge remains fragmented, limiting its translation into coherent, humanised, and clinically applicable nursing care models.

designA qualitative systematic review with interpretive meta-synthesis.

methodsA qualitative meta-synthesis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Systematic searches were performed in PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus for studies published between 2014 and 2024, in English or Spanish, involving adults with palliative care needs and/or their family caregivers from OECD countries. A total of 3232 records were identified. Following screening and full-text review, 13 qualitative studies were included. Methodological quality was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. Findings were synthesised through an interpretive approach using reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsThe care experience is configured as a dynamic, relational, and non-linear process, characterised by emotional, physical, and social demands. Family caregivers report a substantial caregiving burden, often exacerbated by a lack of support, constrained resources, and communication challenges with healthcare teams. From the perspective of people with palliative care needs, the experience of care is closely linked to respect for autonomy, preservation of identity, and the quality of relational presence. Dignity emerges as a cross-cutting theme, strengthened or undermined by nursing practices, interpersonal interactions, and organisational contexts.

conclusionEffective palliative care requires relational nursing practices that uphold dignity and support the family as a unit of care. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nursing practice must systematically integrate relational competencies to preserve patient identity and support the family as a care unit. Bureaucratic healthcare structures often act as active barriers to care, necessitating organisational redesign to support family accompaniment.

Indexed as

CaregiversFamilyPalliative CareAdultFemaleHumansMaleQualitative Researchdignityfamily caregiversnursingpalliative carepatient experiencequalitative meta‐synthesis

Identifiers

PMID42316540
PMCPMC13629286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.