ArticleThe Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research2026
A Case of Oxyntic Gland Neoplasm Incidentally Found During Upper Endoscopic Screening.
Article in The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oxyntic gland neoplasms (OGNs) are rare gastric epithelial tumors characterized by primary differentiation into chief cells and, to a lesser extent, parietal cells. It includes oxyntic gland adenoma and gastric adenocarcinoma of the fundic gland type (GA-FG) depending on the depth of invasion. Although generally indolent, another subgroup, GA-FG mucosa type, may exhibit more invasive behavior. We report a case of an asymptomatic 57-year-old man in whom a small, slightly elevated hyperemic lesion was incidentally found on surveillance endoscopy. Endoscopic mucosal resection using the cap-assisted method (EMR-C) was performed following a biopsy, which suggested a fundic gland-type neoplasm. Histopathologic evaluation confirmed GA-FG with submucosal invasion, but no lymphovascular invasion (pT1b). Post-EMR CT and follow-up endoscopy revealed no evidence of recurrence or metastasis. Recognition of OGNs require histopathologic and immunohistochemical confirmation using markers such as MUC-5AC and MUC-6. In most cases, complete endoscopic resection is curative. Further studies with larger cohorts and long-term follow-ups are needed in order to clarify the natural course and optimal management of this rare neoplasm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.