Trial reportClinical and translational science2026
Thorough QT/QTc Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of Remdesivir on Cardiac Repolarization in Healthy Participants.
Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thorough QT/QTc Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of Remdesivir on Cardiac Repolarization in Healthy Participants.Clinical and translational science · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
QT interval prolongation associated with drug administration is an important consideration in drug development. Patients with COVID-19 are at increased risk for cardiac complications, and QT interval prolongation correlates with higher mortality. This Phase 1 study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and potential effects on QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) of a single supratherapeutic intravenous dose of remdesivir (600 mg; 3 times the loading dose [200 mg] of the approved regimen) in healthy participants, as well as the safety of its solubilizing excipient sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin. The study included 2 cohorts: a dose-selection cohort (sentinel cohort), followed by a partially blinded, randomized, placebo- and positive-controlled, 3-period, 6-treatment sequence, single-dose crossover cohort (TQT cohort). The clinical endpoints were adverse events (AEs), laboratory abnormalities, plasma pharmacokinetic parameters of remdesivir and its metabolites, ΔΔQTcF (baseline-adjusted, placebo-corrected QT interval corrected for heart rate using the Fridericia formula) at each postdose time point, and the relationship between ΔΔQTcF and plasma concentrations of remdesivir by concentration-QT analysis. Sixty participants completed the study. Plasma pharmacokinetics of remdesivir and its metabolites showed no significant differences between cohorts. Sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin was cleared within 24 h, with no pharmacokinetic non-linearities observed. The study found no clinically relevant QTc prolongation from remdesivir at a supratherapeutic dose (ΔΔQTcF < 10 ms). Most AEs were Grade 1 or 2 in severity. No serious AEs or deaths were reported. These findings suggest that a single 600-mg intravenous dose of remdesivir is generally safe and well tolerated and does not lead to QTc prolongation of safety concern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.