ArticleKidney research and clinical practice2026
Clinical practice recommendations for the management of Alport syndrome: a joint statement of the Korean Society of Nephrology and the Korean Society of Pediatric Nephrology.
Article in Kidney research and clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlport syndrome (AS) is a hereditary kidney disorder characterized by progressive hematuria, proteinuria, and kidney failure, frequently accompanied by hearing loss and ocular abnormalities. Although blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is established as the first-line therapy, additional pharmacological interventions have been explored. To formulate evidence-based recommendations tailored to the Korean healthcare setting, the Genetic Kidney Disease Study Group of the Korean Society of Nephrology conducted a systematic review evaluating four therapeutic strategies: RAS blockade, cyclosporine, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i).
methodsThe quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework.
resultsThe review confirmed that early initiation of RAS blockade delays progression to kidney failure and improves long-term survival, with the greatest benefit when initiated at the stage of microscopic hematuria or microalbuminuria. In contrast, evidence supporting cyclosporine , MRAs, and SGLT2i remains limited, primarily derived from small observational studies with short follow-up and heterogeneous populations. Although cyclosporine and MRAs have demonstrated short-term reductions in proteinuria, neither has shown sustained renoprotective effects, and cyclosporine is associated with a substantial risk of nephrotoxicity. Evidence regarding SGLT2i is inconsistent, with insufficient data on long-term efficacy in AS.
conclusionAccordingly, these guidelines strongly recommend early RAS blockade as the cornerstone of AS, while no recommendations are made for routine use of cyclosporine, MRAs, or SGLT2i. Well-designed clinical trials are needed to expand therapeutic options and improve long-term outcomes in AS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.