ArticleBMC public health2026
From screening to care: a longitudinal implementation evaluation of a community-based hepatitis B program.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommunity-based hepatitis B virus (HBV) screening programs are widely used to identify chronic infection in high-risk immigrant populations in the United States. However, screening alone does not ensure engagement in care, and the processes that determine progression from diagnosis to sustained clinical management remain poorly characterized. In particular, there is limited longitudinal evidence evaluating real-world implementation across the full HBV care continuum.
methodsWe conducted a RE-AIM-based implementation evaluation of a longstanding community-based HBV screening and education program among Korean American immigrant communities in the northeastern United States from 2009 to 2016. Through 152 outreach events, we delivered culturally and linguistically tailored education, venipuncture-based serologic testing, direct disclosure of results, and referral to care. Using prospectively collected programmatic data, we assessed reach, operational yield, and attrition across the care continuum among individuals testing positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), with longitudinal follow-up of up to eight years.
resultsAmong 8,453 individuals screened, 204 (2.4%) were HBsAg positive. Of these, 121 (59.3%) had longitudinal follow-up data available, and 71 (58.7%) accessed clinical care, corresponding to 34.8% of all HBsAg-positive individuals. Most participants who accessed care received follow-up through private community-based outpatient practices (64/71; 90.1%) rather than centralized systems. Approximately 42 individuals required screening to identify one case, and 104 to achieve one confirmed linkage to care. Substantial attrition occurred between diagnosis and initial clinical engagement, representing the primary loss point in the care continuum. Lack of health insurance was the most frequently reported structural barrier.
conclusionsCommunity-based HBV screening effectively identifies individuals with chronic infection but does not ensure completion of the prevention pathway. This study provides longitudinal, real-world evidence quantifying attrition across the HBV care continuum and demonstrates that prevention is an implementation-dependent process requiring sustained engagement beyond initial screening. Strategies that integrate screening with patient navigation, longitudinal follow-up, and improved access to care are needed to enhance linkage to care and clinical outcomes in high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.