ArticleReproductive health2026
"My story is good… It's not like that for all": Uneven access to contraception among incarcerated women in New South Wales, Australia.
Article in Reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvidence indicates high levels of unmet contraceptive need among justice-involved women, linked to intersecting vulnerabilities such as housing instability, substance use, violence and poor mental health. In Australia, limited research has explored how women in prison navigate access to family planning services. This study aimed to examine the experiences of incarcerated women in New South Wales (NSW) in accessing contraception and making fertility-related decisions.
methodsThe study formed part of the Second Sexual Health and Attitudes of Australian Prisoners (SHAAP-2) study. Seventeen women aged 19-45 were recruited from two NSW correctional centres. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted face-to-face or via video call, recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically in NVivo14. Coding drew on the Behavioural Model for Vulnerable Populations, supplemented by inductive thematic analysis to capture cross-cutting themes. Content analysis was also applied to describe contraceptive needs.
resultsThree overarching findings were identified. First, women's access to contraception was less shaped by mistrust of providers than by system unreliability. While some reported supportive care, many described unanswered requests, long delays, and unsafe practices such as attempting implant removals. Second, incarceration prompted reflection and deliberate fertility planning. Women re-evaluated what it meant to be "ready" for motherhood, some seeking to delay pregnancy until achieving stability, others eager to conceive quickly after release, due to a sense of lost time. Third, women's choices were constrained by side-effects and limited method options. Repeated failures with pills, injections, or devices sometimes led women to sterilisation as the "only certain" option, though some later regretted this decision.
conclusionsPrisons represent a critical but underutilised setting for meeting reproductive health needs. Despite policy commitments to equivalence of care, contraceptive services in custody remain neglected. Findings highlight the need for stronger structural supports including timely service pathways and effective pre-release planning, to ensure women can access safe, flexible, and non-coercive contraception. Addressing these gaps is essential to upholding reproductive rights and reducing health inequities for incarcerated women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.