Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42316315›Full record

ReviewGut pathogens2026

Human microbiome alterations in Epstein-Barr Virus infection: a systematic review.

Arghavan Zebardast, Kasra Javadi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut pathogens, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arghavan ZebardastInfectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Kasra JavadiInfectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran. kasrajavadii@gmail.com.

Funding

Babol University of Medical Sciences 724137379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with several malignancies and immune-mediated conditions, but its relationship with human microbial communities remains incompletely understood. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for human studies evaluating EBV-associated alterations in the microbiome. Because of substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively, and study quality was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Nine observational studies published between 2017 and 2025 were included, covering the oral cavity, nasopharynx, gut, gastric tissue, and subgingival plaque. EBV positivity or EBV-related clinical status was associated with niche-specific microbial shifts, including altered gut bacterial profiles, distinct microbial patterns in EBV-associated gastric cancer tissue, and enrichment of oral-associated pathobionts in nasopharyngeal carcinoma compartments. Alpha- and beta-diversity findings were inconsistent across studies. Overall, the evidence suggests context-dependent alterations in the microbiome in EBV-positive or EBV-related disease settings. However, these findings should be interpreted as EBV-associated rather than EBV-specific, particularly when EBV status overlaps with malignancy. The small observational evidence base, heterogeneous EBV-status definitions, methodological variability, and residual confounding limit causal inference. Larger longitudinal and standardized multi-omic studies are needed to clarify directionality, mechanisms, and clinical relevance.

Indexed as

DysbiosisEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHerpesvirus 4MicrobiotaSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID42316315
PMCPMC13584428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.