ArticleBMC global and public health2026
Mobility-informed metapopulation models predict the spatio-temporal spread of respiratory epidemics across scales.
Article in BMC global and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPredicting where and when epidemics will spread is essential for guiding early public health responses, yet remains challenging when surveillance data are sparse. Mobility-based approaches offer a promising alternative by leveraging human movement patterns to predict spatial spread without requiring detailed epidemiological data.
methodsWe evaluated the ability of mobility-informed effective distance to predict the relative timing of epidemic onset for three respiratory pathogens: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), seasonal influenza virus, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). We compared effective distances derived from county-level commuting data, airline traffic flows, and a theoretical radiation model within a metapopulation framework. Analyses were conducted at the county level across South Carolina for all three pathogens and at the state level across the United States for influenza and SARS-CoV-2.
resultsEffective distance reliably predicted the relative order of epidemic onset across pathogens and spatial scales. Across all analyses, epidemics arrived earlier in larger, more connected populations, and effective distance outperformed geographic distance as a predictor of onset timing. In metapopulation simulations of a hypothetical respiratory pathogen, radiation-model effective distance was highly correlated with simulated arrival times (Spearman's ρ = 0.95, 95% CI [0.90 to 0.98]), substantially outperforming commuting-based effective distance (ρ = 0.54, 95% CI [0.24 to 0.75]). In empirical analyses at the county level in South Carolina, radiation-model effective distance consistently outperformed commuting-based measures for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) first wave (ρ = 0.62 vs. 0.39), the 2022-2023 influenza season (ρ = 0.57 vs. 0.44), and the 2022-2023 RSV season (ρ = 0.70 vs. 0.47). At the state level, airline-based effective distance predicted arrival timing for COVID-19 (ρ = 0.46, 95% CI [0.19 to 0.66]) and onset timing for the 2024/2025 influenza season (ρ = 0.45, 95% CI [0.14 to 0.66]).
conclusionsMobility-informed models capture consistent spatiotemporal patterns of epidemic spread across pathogens and scales. These findings support their use as scalable, data-efficient tools for early outbreak preparedness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.