Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42316273›Full record

ArticleBMC global and public health2026

Mobility-informed metapopulation models predict the spatio-temporal spread of respiratory epidemics across scales.

Aakash Pandey, Lu Zhong, Lior Rennert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC global and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aakash PandeyCenter for Public Health Modeling and Response, Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, South Carolina, USA. evomathbio@gmail.com.
Lu ZhongCenter for Public Health Modeling and Response, Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, South Carolina, USA.
Lior RennertCenter for Public Health Modeling and Response, Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, South Carolina, USA.

Funding

Developing a dynamic modeling framework for surveillance, prediction, and real-time resource allocation to reduce health disparities during Covid-19 and future pandemicsR01LM014193 · NLM · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI Lior Rennert · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
Center for Forecasting and Outbreak Analytics NU38FT000011NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014193U.S. National Library of Medicine R01LM014193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredicting where and when epidemics will spread is essential for guiding early public health responses, yet remains challenging when surveillance data are sparse. Mobility-based approaches offer a promising alternative by leveraging human movement patterns to predict spatial spread without requiring detailed epidemiological data.

methodsWe evaluated the ability of mobility-informed effective distance to predict the relative timing of epidemic onset for three respiratory pathogens: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), seasonal influenza virus, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). We compared effective distances derived from county-level commuting data, airline traffic flows, and a theoretical radiation model within a metapopulation framework. Analyses were conducted at the county level across South Carolina for all three pathogens and at the state level across the United States for influenza and SARS-CoV-2.

resultsEffective distance reliably predicted the relative order of epidemic onset across pathogens and spatial scales. Across all analyses, epidemics arrived earlier in larger, more connected populations, and effective distance outperformed geographic distance as a predictor of onset timing. In metapopulation simulations of a hypothetical respiratory pathogen, radiation-model effective distance was highly correlated with simulated arrival times (Spearman's ρ = 0.95, 95% CI [0.90 to 0.98]), substantially outperforming commuting-based effective distance (ρ = 0.54, 95% CI [0.24 to 0.75]). In empirical analyses at the county level in South Carolina, radiation-model effective distance consistently outperformed commuting-based measures for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) first wave (ρ = 0.62 vs. 0.39), the 2022-2023 influenza season (ρ = 0.57 vs. 0.44), and the 2022-2023 RSV season (ρ = 0.70 vs. 0.47). At the state level, airline-based effective distance predicted arrival timing for COVID-19 (ρ = 0.46, 95% CI [0.19 to 0.66]) and onset timing for the 2024/2025 influenza season (ρ = 0.45, 95% CI [0.14 to 0.66]).

conclusionsMobility-informed models capture consistent spatiotemporal patterns of epidemic spread across pathogens and scales. These findings support their use as scalable, data-efficient tools for early outbreak preparedness.

Indexed as

COVID-19InfluenzaMetapopulation modelMobility networkRespiratory syncytial virusSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID42316273
PMCPMC13277207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.