ArticleVeterinary research2026
Veterinary fixed-dose antibiotics in Africa: a need for evidence-based regulation.
Article in Veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fixed-dose combination (FDC) antibiotics are commonly used in animal health; however, their use faces increasing scrutiny due to concerns about unproven efficacy, inappropriate dosing, safety and limited regulatory oversight. We reviewed veterinary drug registries from Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda and Zimbabwe, identifying 2339 registered products, of which 867 (37.1%) contained antibiotics. Among these, 238 (27.5%) were FDCs, representing 45 unique combinations - most commonly two-antibiotic formulations such as penicillin/dihydrostreptomycin, tylosin/doxycycline and trimethoprim/sulfadiazine. Most formulations (77.8%, n = 35) contained two antibiotics, while 15.5% and 6.7% contained three and four antibiotics, respectively. Nearly half of FDC brands (47.1%, 112/238) contained antibiotics from both the Caution and Prudence categories, while 39.5% (94/238) contained antibiotics from the Prudence category alone. Notably, 8.4% (20/238) of FDC brands contained colistin, with or without enrofloxacin, and 5% (12/238) included vitamin combinations. Some antimicrobial FDCs may be clinically justified, for example, by broadening spectrum or achieving pharmacological synergy, but many lack a clear therapeutic rationale, underscoring the need for an evidence-based regulatory review and clearer criteria for appropriate veterinary FDCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.