ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2026
The longitudinal relationships between parent-child alienation and depression in adolescents: insights of network analysis.
Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdolescent depression is a major health issue requiring precise interventions. While Network theory guides symptom-targeted interventions, longitudinal studies in community adolescents remain scarce. Ecological Systems Theory indicates parent-child alienation (PA) as a depression disruptor, but how PA influences depressive networks is unknown. This study aims to bridge this gap by examining symptom-level interactions between PA and depression in community adolescents through two-wave network analysis.
methods1503 Chinese adolescents (mean age = 13.95 ± 2.05 years; 49.63% female) were surveyed at two time points one year apart [baseline (T1), 12-months later (T2)]. Analyses included: T1 cross-sectional depression network (n = 1503), T1/T2 bridge networks (n = 1148 each), and T1 → T2 cross-lagged panel network (CLPN; n = 1148).
results(1) Anhedonia had the highest expected influence (EI = 1.03) within the T1 depression network. (2) Anhedonia showed the highest bridge EI (BEIT1 = 0.19; BEIT2 = 0.13) linking PA and depression. (3) CLPN revealed bidirectional PA-depression prediction, with stronger prediction effect of depression on subsequent PA than vice versa. Compared with alienation towards father, alienation towards mother predicted subsequent depressive symptoms more strongly. Key paths: "alienation towards mother" predicting subsequent "anhedonia" and "negative mood" (both weight = 0.04); "negative self-esteem" predicting subsequent "alienation towards father (weight = 0.57) /mother (weight = 0.42)". (4) In CLPN, negative self-esteem was the central symptom (out-EI = 1.52), while anhedonia was the most affected depressive symptom (in-EI = 0.39).
conclusionsThis study confirms anhedonia as central symptom within depression network and a core bridge linking PA and depressive symptoms cross-sectionally. Longitudinally, PA and depression bidirectionally predict each other, with depression exerting stronger forward prediction. Furthermore, alienation towards mothers shows stronger prediction on subsequent depressive symptoms. Negative self-esteem functions as an activator and anhedonia as maintainer in CLPN. These findings integrate Network Theory and Ecological Systems Theory to elucidate how PA prompts depression network dynamic and depression self-maintenance pathways. This calls for school-based anhedonia screening for alienated youth and family-focused interventions targeting negative self-esteem and anhedonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.