ReviewBMC medical genomics2026
Familial lymphoma and genetic predisposition: an updated review.
Review in BMC medical genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral factors contribute to the development of malignant lymphomas including environmental exposures, bacterial and viral infections, as well as familial and genetic factors. MAIN BODY: Numerous somatic variants are involved in lymphomagenesis, and an increasing number of germline variants predisposing patients to lymphoid neoplasm have been identified. Although most lymphomas arise sporadically, epidemiological studies have linked a familial history of lymphomas and other hematological tumors with an increased lymphoma risk. Although rare, familial clustering of malignant lymphoma is well documented, and the constellations suggest inherited risk factors. Recent technological advancements have improved our ability to identify genetic factors associated with lymphoma that overall lead to a better understanding of genetic susceptibility for these entities. In this context, we here provide a comprehensive perspective on lymphoma risk factors to support improved lymphoma risk assessment and testing. A dedicated clinical management could influence future advances in lymphoma therapies and might also prevent severe toxicity and secondary malignancies. However, to date, only few susceptibility genes for malignant lymphomas have been identified. Highly penetrant mutations in known genes cannot account for most of the excess in a polygenic and heterogenic disease such as cancer. High-throughput sequencing identifies pathogenic variants that may constitute most low-penetrance alleles. However, their detection requires many well-characterized cases and controls. In this review, we therefore also include a short discussion on a Swiss cohort where we prospectively collect and samples for genetic data from individuals with a family history of lymphoma. We are convinced that such an approach is more informative and feasible than a population-based project with unselected cases and aim to better inform both genetic counsellors and oncologists.
conclusionInherited genetic factors contribute to lymphoma risk in a subset of patients. Improved identification of susceptibility variants, particularly through family-based studies, may enhance risk assessment and inform personalized clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.