ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2026
Healthcare providers' approaches to sexual function in women with migration histories: a qualitative study using Andersen's behavioural model.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSexual function (SF) remains a critically neglected dimension of Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH), particularly for Women with Migration Histories (WMH), who face intersecting cultural, institutional, and systemic barriers to care. Despite global health frameworks positioning sexual wellbeing as integral to holistic health, SF is rarely integrated into routine SRH practice. This study examines healthcare providers' approaches to SF in the clinical care of WMH in South Australia (SA).
methodsAn exploratory qualitative design was employed, using semi-structured interviews with ten SRH providers in SA, including nurses, allied health professionals, and a gynaecologist. Participants were purposively sampled for their experience in caring for WMH. Data were analysed thematically using NVivo. An adapted version of the Andersen Behavioural Model of Health Services Use (ABMHSU) was applied to guide the development of the interview guide and structure the analysis across three domains: predisposing factors, enabling resources, and need-related factors.
resultsProviders described limited engagement with SF in routine clinical care, which remained focused on reproductive control. They identified predisposing barriers operating within the clinical encounter, including taboos and stigma surrounding sexual health, marginalisation, mistrust, and communication difficulties shaped by cultural and linguistic distance. Enabling resources were undermined by Medicare ineligibility, financial hardship, interpreter-related concerns, and fragmented care pathways. Need-related barriers included system strain limiting timely responses and restricted access to culturally appropriate sexual therapy. Together, these interconnected barriers were perceived to reinforce the marginalisation of SF in SRH care for WMH.
conclusionsIncorporating SF into routine SRH care for WMH requires coordinated improvements at both the service and provider levels. At the service level, modifiable strategies include culturally tailored SRH literacy, interpreter-sensitive communication, system navigation support, and Medicare-funded, culturally adapted sexual therapy. At the provider level, addressing personal discomfort, insufficient training, and concerns about cultural appropriateness requires comprehensive, mandatory training in trauma-informed and culturally safe care, supported by centralised and accessible resources. Together, these interventions are critical to improving SRH service provision and utilisation, sexual autonomy, health literacy, consumer satisfaction, and overall quality of life for WMH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.