Observational studyBMC medical education2026
The evaluation of the technical quality of root canal fillings performed by preclinical students on extracted teeth.
Observational study in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the technical quality of root canal fillings performed by undergraduate preclinical students and to interpret the findings according to tooth group and canal configuration.
methodsThis retrospective observational study included 1,050 root canal fillings of extracted teeth performed by 120 third-year dental students between 2019 and 2021. Canal preparation was performed using a standardized manual step-back instrumentation protocol, and obturation was performed using cold lateral condensation with gutta-percha cones and resin-based sealer. Standardized digital periapical radiographs were used to assess treatment quality based on length, homogeneity, and taper criteria. A scoring system (0, 1, or 2) was used for statistical analysis, and inter-examiner agreement was assessed using the Kappa test.
resultsOverall, 692 of 1,050 root canal fillings (65.9%) were technically adequate. Adequacy was highest in mandibular premolars (82.6%) and lowest in mandibular molars (44.8%). The rate of adequate root canal fillings was significantly higher in single-rooted teeth than in multi-rooted teeth (p < 0.05). Among the evaluated criteria, adequacy rates were 82.3% for length, 82.4% for taper, and 77.5% for homogeneity. The lowest adequacy rates for all three criteria were observed in mandibular molars.
conclusionsMost root canal fillings performed by preclinical students met the predefined technical adequacy criteria. Lower adequacy rates were observed in multi-rooted teeth, particularly mandibular molars. These findings should be interpreted within the limitations of a single-institution retrospective preclinical study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.