Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42316156›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

Knowledge gaps in pressure injury, medical device-related pressure injury, and skin tear among intensive care unit nurses.

Öznur Erbay Dalli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Öznur Erbay DalliDepartment of Internal Medicine Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bursa Uludag University, Nilüfer, Bursa, 16059, Turkey. oznurerbay@uludag.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2282-0846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensive care unit (ICU) patients are at high risk for pressure injuries (PIs), medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs), and skin tears (STs). Although nurses play a key role in preventing all three conditions, existing research has mainly focused on PIs, with limited evidence addressing nurses' combined knowledge related to MDRPIs and STs. In particular, shared deficiencies across these conditions remain unclear. This study aimed to assess ICU nurses' knowledge of PIs, MDRPIs, and STs together to identify overlapping knowledge gaps that may affect skin integrity management in ICU settings.

methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted with 283 ICU nurses. Data were collected using three validated tools: the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool 2.0 (PUKAT 2.0), the Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury Knowledge Assessment Tool (MDRPI-KAT), and the Skin Tear Knowledge Assessment Instrument (OASES), enabling construct-specific measurement across related conditions.

resultsKnowledge levels varied across domains, with mean total scores of 14.44 ± 3.43 (PUKAT 2.0), 8.73 ± 1.83 (MDRPI-KAT), and 10.17 ± 2.44 (OASES). Across all three tools, prevention consistently emerged as the lowest-scoring domain. Higher knowledge scores were observed among nurses with greater professional experience, postgraduate education, and prior care experience related to STs.

conclusionsThe findings provide a comprehensive overview of ICU nurses' knowledge regarding PIs, MDRPIs, and STs, highlighting variability across domains and consistently lower scores in prevention-related areas. These results underscore the need for targeted educational strategies to strengthen knowledge across key aspects of skin integrity management in intensive care settings. However, findings should be interpreted with caution due to potential sampling bias related to social media-based recruitment and the absence of multivariable analysis.

trial registrationNot applicable.

Indexed as

Critical care nursesKnowledgeMedical device-related pressure injuriesNursesPressure injuriesSkin tears

Identifiers

PMID42316156
PMCPMC13523301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.