ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026
Gut dysbiosis associated with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and biological plausibility of disease-specific probiotic intervention: a translational study.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gut Microbiome Diversity, Functional Potential, and Ecological Relevance of Hottentotta tamulus.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is among the most prevalent morbidities in late preterm and term infants. Although the gut-lung axis has been implicated in neonatal respiratory disease, the relationship between RDS and early gut microbiome composition remains poorly characterized. This study aimed to characterize gut microbiome alterations associated with RDS and surfactant replacement therapy (SRT), and to evaluate the biological plausibility of a disease-specific probiotic intervention.
methodsTwo complementary cohorts were prospectively enrolled. In the clinical observational cohort (n = 45), fecal samples collected within 48 h of birth were analyzed by Nanopore 16S rRNA sequencing across three groups: infants without RDS (control group, n = 25), infants with RDS who did not receive SRT (RDS(S-) group, n = 7), and infants with RDS who received SRT (RDS(S+) group, n = 13). In the probiotic discovery cohort (n = 40), gut microbiota of infants without RDS (CON group, n = 17) and infants with RDS (RDS group, n = 23) were characterized by metagenomic sequencing and culturomics. Candidate probiotic strains were evaluated in a fermenter for intestinal microbiota model (FIMM) and a fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) mouse model.
resultsThe RDS(S-) group exhibited depletion of beneficial taxa including Bifidobacterium and Lacticaseibacillus and enrichment of opportunistic pathogens including Enterococcus and Staphylococcus. Following SRT, gut microbial profiles partially shifted toward those of the control group. Limosilactobacillus fermentum SLAM_LAF05 and Bifidobacterium longum SLAM_BIL02 were identified as CON-enriched candidate probiotic strains through direct microbiome comparison and selected based on superior acid and bile tolerance and adhesion capacity. In the FIMM model, probiotic supplementation increased microbial diversity and suppressed opportunistic pathogens. In the FMT mouse model, probiotic supplementation was associated with upregulation of ZO-1, MUC2, and Reg3g, reduction of fecal calprotectin, and restoration of serum IgG levels.
conclusionsThis study provides an early translational characterization of RDS-associated gut dysbiosis and its partial resolution following SRT, and establishes proof-of-concept for a disease-specific probiotic approach. These findings offer a new perspective on the interplay between gut microbial dynamics and the early postnatal respiratory course, and provide a basis for future investigations into microbiota-targeted strategies in neonates with RDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.