ArticleBMC biotechnology2026
3D-printed metamaterial femoral prostheses via scalar field fusion and directional porous structure regulation.
Article in BMC biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study integrates topology optimization, scalar field fusion (a method to realize smooth transition between solid and porous regions through implicit function interpolation), and directional porous structure control to develop a design method for customized metamaterial femoral prostheses, addressing key problems of conventional prostheses including poor implant compatibility, excessive bone resection, and insufficient long-term stability.
resultsWe initially completed the personalized design of femoral prostheses using a combination of retrograde and antegrade methods. This was followed by integrating topology optimization with porous structure filling to design the metamaterial. The prostheses were directly manufactured using 3D printing technology, and their performance was thoroughly evaluated. The results showed that the femoral prosthesis experienced the highest stress at 70° knee flexion (half-squat position), with a maximum stress of 1.269 ×
conclusionsAfter post-processing, the developed prototype serves as a valid proof-of-concept, thus establishing a foundation for the subsequent development and practical application of high-performance personalized biofix femoral prostheses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.