ArticleBMC medical education2026
Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of a point-of-care ultrasound program for the diagnosis of forearm fractures in rural Nepal: a mid-level provider qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Nepal, fractures contribute an estimated 2.5 million disability-adjusted life years annually, with upper-extremity injuries representing the most common fracture type. While radiography is the diagnostic standard, access to X-ray machines and trained technicians is limited in rural Nepal, leading to delayed diagnosis and substantial patient costs. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a low-cost, portable imaging modality that has demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing upper-extremity fractures and is well suited to resource-limited settings.
methodsSeventeen health assistants and auxiliary health workers, together called mid-level providers (MLPs), who attended a two-day ultrasound training program focused on forearm fractures were selected for this study. Participants were selected based on successful completion of the training and continued practice at Bayalpata Hospital. Participants were interviewed with a semistructured guide that assessed their perceptions of the training and their implementation of ultrasound in clinical practice. Thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo.
resultsSeventeen MLPs participated, representing a combined 126 years of clinical experience. Five major themes emerged: (1) positive perceptions of the training program, (2) frequent clinical application of fracture POCUS, (3) improved diagnostic confidence and autonomy, (4) barriers, including language and duty-time constraints, and (5) strong support for expansion to additional facilities and anatomic regions. Participants reported reduced reliance on radiography, faster delivery of care, and enthusiasm for further POCUS training.
conclusionMid-level providers successfully integrated forearm fracture POCUS into routine clinical practice following ultrasound training. MLPs reported confidence using POCUS for fracture diagnosis after a two-day, hands-on training session. These findings support the acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of the program and support the expansion of ultrasound training in rural Nepal, particularly in areas lacking X-ray access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.