ArticleBMC public health2026
Environmental and occupational exposures for chronic kidney disease of unknown aetiology (CKDu): field investigations in rural Sri Lanka.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic kidney disease of unknown aetiology (CKDu) is a public health concern, with a male predominance in rural agricultural communities in Sri Lanka. This cross-sectional field study investigated environmental and occupational exposures potentially contributing to CKDu prevalence in rural villages. Field observations and informal conversations with villagers were used to record potential exposures in situ and contextualise how they interacted in daily life.
methodsBased on CKDu occurrence in Kandy Teaching Hospital renal biopsy data, 12 villages in Matale and Badulla Districts with variable CKDu occurrence were included. Field observations documented housing conditions, drinking water sources, agricultural activities, and other potential exposures. Unstructured conversations with villagers provided information on less observable exposures, including temporal changes in drinking water supply. Local government offices provided information on village occupations and registered chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients.
resultsAgrochemical handling was performed almost exclusively by men and, particularly in paddy fields, often without personal protective equipment (PPE), despite reported use by farmers. Consistent use of improved water sources, such as reverse osmosis filters, was hindered by cost, limited availability and travel time, leading to continued use of well water. Villages with higher estimated CKD prevalence were characterised by greater dependence on agriculture, agrochemical use without adequate PPE and limited access to improved drinking water.
conclusionsThis study indicates that exposure measurement for CKDu research should better capture PPE use and drinking water-source use. Structured questionnaires on the primary drinking water source may not capture multiple water-source use. Similarly, closed-ended questions on PPE use may not reflect actual practice unless researchers and farmers share a clear understanding of what constitutes PPE. The finding that men almost exclusively applied agrochemicals may help explain the male predominance of CKDu and warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.