ArticleBMC public health2026
Effectiveness, mechanisms, implementation, and cost-offset of an intersectoral prevention program targeting youth mental health difficulties: the STIME study protocol.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMental health problems among children and adolescents are rising across Europe, with around 15-20% affected. In Denmark, approximately 15% of young people are diagnosed with a mental disorder before the age of 18 years, a rate that has steadily increased over recent decades. Early mental health problems have lasting negative impacts on development, education, relationships, and future employment, representing a major public health challenge. Yet, there is limited evidence on how preventive interventions perform under real-world conditions. The STIME study addresses this gap by evaluating the effectiveness, mechanisms, implementation, and economic implications of a comprehensive preventive program for youth mental health.
methodsThe STIME study comprises four sub-studies. Sub-study 1 consists of five separate waitlisted randomised controlled trials evaluating the interventions 'Signs of disordered eating', 'Signs of self-harm', 'Signs of internalising', 'Take the control back', and the 'Parent Pilots'. Participants will be randomly allocated to either immediate intervention or, depending on the intervention of interest, an active or passive control group followed by delayed access to the intervention. The active control groups will be delivered online by trained psychologists. The primary outcome across all interventions is mental wellbeing, assessed using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Impact Scale and the WHO-5 Wellbeing Index. Secondary outcomes are intervention-specific and measured using validated scales. Data will be collected at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1), and six months post-baseline (T2). Sub-study 2 explores mechanisms of change, Sub-study 3 examines implementation processes, and Sub-study 4 assesses economic impact and cost-offsets. DISCUSSION: The STIME study is among the first large-scale, multi-component evaluations of preventive mental health interventions implemented under real-world conditions. By integrating prevention, implementation, and economic perspectives, this study will provide robust evidence to inform effective, scalable, and sustainable public mental health strategies for children, adolescents, and families.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier H25031805 (accessible here https://register. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/prs/beta/studies/S000FX7400000260/recordSummary ), registered on October 3rd (version 1).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.