ArticleBMC public health2026
Mapping definitions and measures of police violence in health literature: a scoping review.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPolice violence continues to be a significant public health problem, especially in the United States. A limited but growing body of research has explored the relationship between police violence and health outcomes. Emerging evidence suggests that exposure to police violence may be a contributing factor to health inequities, particularly among Black Americans. Yet, there remains a lack of consensus on a conceptual and operational definition of police violence within health disciplines. This scoping review aims to address this gap by mapping the definitions and measures for assessing police violence in health literature.
methodsWe comprehensively searched PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and APA PsycInfo databases. We included studies published as peer-reviewed primary research in health journals and in the English language. Eligible studies measured police violence.
resultsOf the 1692 references identified, 204 references were retained for full-text review, and 114 references reporting on 98 studies met the inclusion criteria. We identified over 100 terms for police violence, which we clustered into 22 categories including abuse, assault, harassment, killing, and violence. The most common terms were "police violence," "police abuse," and "police brutality." Only two-thirds of studies (n = 76) included a definition of police violence. Police violence was most frequently defined as "police killings" (n = 23) and excessive use-of-force (n = 10). Self-reports of police violence were the most common measure (n = 48). Other measures included counts of fatal police violence from open-source and governmental databases, as well as counts of deaths/injuries classified as "legal intervention" in medical records.
conclusionsThe health literature lacks a clear and consistent definition of police violence. While multiple measures show some potential for surveillance of police violence, few studies have conducted in-depth psychometric analyses. Recommendations for future research include developing an explicit definition of police violence and reporting psychometric data for measures. Additionally, there is a need for systematic data collection of police violence in health settings and the establishment of a federally supported and accessible public database of police violence to address underreporting and undermeasurement of police violence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.