ReviewBMC pediatrics2026
Pure posteromedial tibiotalar dislocation in an adolescent student: a case report and literature review.
Review in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPure Posteromedial tibiotalar dislocation unaccompanied by fractures represents an exceptionally rare orthopedic injury, accounting for approximately 0.065% of ankle injuries and 0.46% of ankle dislocations. Such injuries typically result from high-energy trauma, with limited reports involving low-energy mechanisms in athletic activities. This case illustrates the successful management of a closed posterior ankle dislocation in a young student, emphasizing the importance of prompt intervention and structured rehabilitation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 17-year-old male student sustained a pure posterior tibiotalar dislocation during a recreational basketball game, following a forced inversion and plantarflexion mechanism. Immediate closed reduction was performed under local anesthesia combined with intravenous analgesia, followed by immobilization in a splint and subsequent transition to a controlled ankle motion (CAM) boot. Post-reduction CT confirmed anatomical reduction and excluded occult fracture, while CTA showed no evidence of vascular injury; serial clinical examinations revealed no sensory or motor deficit. At one-year follow-up, the patient achieved a full functional recovery and unrestricted return to academic and physical activities.
conclusionThis case underscores that early closed reduction and phased rehabilitation can yield excellent outcomes in pure posteromedial tibiotalar dislocation, even in adolescent populations. The report highlights the viability of non-operative management for such injuries and contributes to the sparse literature on low-energy mechanisms in young, non-professional athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.