Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42316089›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Adherence to recommended immunization schedule during adolescence: findings of a cross-sectional study in the Southern part of Italy.

Francesca Licata, Concetta Arianna Scicchitano, Francesca Ficara, Gianfranco Di Gennaro, Aida Bianco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Francesca LicataDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catanzaro ''Magna Græcia'', Viale Europa, Catanzaro, 88100, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3704-6822
Concetta Arianna ScicchitanoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catanzaro ''Magna Græcia'', Viale Europa, Catanzaro, 88100, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6349-8094
Francesca FicaraDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catanzaro ''Magna Græcia'', Viale Europa, Catanzaro, 88100, Italy.
Gianfranco Di GennaroDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catanzaro ''Magna Græcia'', Viale Europa, Catanzaro, 88100, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7204-4091
Aida BiancoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Catanzaro ''Magna Græcia'', Viale Europa, Catanzaro, 88100, Italy. a.bianco@unicz.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4674-0306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescence is a pivotal life stage during which individuals develop health-related attitudes and behaviours that frequently persist into adulthood, making it a crucial period for shaping long-term engagement with preventive care. Despite Italy's national recommendations for adolescent vaccines (HPV, MenACWY, and the dTap-IPV booster), coverage gaps persist. By analyzing the self-reported vaccination history of university students, this study aims to assess adolescent vaccine adherence, willingness to vaccinate and their predictors to better inform targeted public health interventions.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among university students (aged 18-29 years). An online, anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was developed to gather data on socio-demographic characteristics, past adherence to vaccinations offered during adolescence (i.e., HPV and MenACWY vaccines and the dTap-IPV booster), willingness to get vaccinated, factors influencing vaccination decision making, and sources of information on vaccinations.

resultsAmong the 527 enrolled participants, 29% reported having received the MenACWY vaccine during adolescence, with the lack of healthcare worker (HCW) recommendation cited as the leading barrier (59.4%). HPV vaccine uptake was the strongest predictor of being vaccinated against MenACWY vaccination. A majority of the students (68.3%) reported receiving the HPV vaccine during adolescence, primarily to prevent HPV-related cancers (55.8%). Female sex, younger age, and higher parental education were positively associated with the HPV vaccine uptake. Additionally, 89.4% received the dTap-IPV booster, and this uptake was positively associated with both HPV and MenACWY vaccination. Notably, one-third (31.1%) reported that an HCW had discouraged vaccination, and even though nearly all (99.4%) cited HCWs as their primary source of information on vaccination.

conclusionsA persistent gap in adolescent vaccination adherence remains, particularly for MenACWY and HPV, driven by unbalanced risk perceptions and frequent missed clinical opportunities by HCWs. Conversely, vaccine mandates ensured high dTap-IPV coverage. The strong correlation across vaccine types highlights the potential of "clustered" immunization behaviors. To bridge these coverage gaps, interventions must strengthen HCW counseling, utilize low-friction delivery models like school-based clinics, and deploy dual-targeted strategies that reframe vaccination as a shared social responsibility.

Indexed as

Immunization SchedulePapillomavirus VaccinesPatient ComplianceStudentsAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansItalyMaleMeningococcal VaccinesSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesVaccines, CombinedVaccines, ConjugateMenACWYMeningococcal VaccinesPapillomavirus VaccinesVaccines, CombinedVaccines, ConjugateAdolescent immunizationdTap-IPV boosterHPV vaccineMenACWY vaccineUniversity studentsVaccinationVaccine adherence

Identifiers

PMID42316089
PMCPMC13523450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.